Friday, November 15, 2024

 Regarding the 2024 Elections:   

Am I surprised?  No.  Disappointed, yes, but not surprised. 

I see all around me people with serious concerns about the political changes of misfortune going on all around us and I almost feel guilty for not feeling in a more sympathetic manner.  The reason I will feel empathy but not sympathy is because I have had over 20 years to prepare for this time.   I sympathize with the feeling, but not the "shock" of the feeling.

Let me explain:

Many people will talk about 9/11 being a “watershed” experience for them.  9/11 didn’t surprise me.  If I was surprised, it was that such an attack didn’t happen before then.  We, the US, had been exhibiting our A/B (Arrogance/Belligerence) for such a long time before then, such an attack was inevitable.  Similarly, we, the US, had been exhibiting a complete lack of Skills of Democracy for such a long time before now that this election was inevitable.

Pure Democracy (as opposed to US Democracy) is based on two principles:  1) that there is an educated and informed populace; and 2) that the populace will vote for the good of society – even at a personal cost.  One doesn’t have to be a social scientist to see that we do not have, nor have we had, either of these two principles as a basis of our US Democracy.

By educated, I’m talking about being educated in the Skills of Democracy – not educated according to STEM or even STEAM subjects. 

My watershed experience happened in 2003 rather than 2000.  I had been participating in several “anti-war” demonstrations and protests against our invading Iraq at that time.  This included the largest protest in the world up to that time with over 5 Million people in the streets all on one day (Saturday).   It was evident that Bush, et al, was chafing at the bit to invade even to the point of sending Colin Powel to fall upon his sword by addressing the United Nations with obvious fabrications.  The only recognition this demonstration received was the sign of the  President’s social finger as a few weeks later he invaded Iraq and murdered/slaughtered well over 100,000 innocent men, women, and children.

Although the invasion was a heinous crime, to me, the bigger crime was that our society allowed this to happen without any repercussions.  Nada.  Nil.  That was when I realized that I did not want to identify with US Democracy any more.  That is when I decided to identify as a Global Citizen rather than a US Citizen.

One of the things I did was instead of blaming or accusing just the administration as being in the wrong, I blamed our society for allowing this to go unchecked.  Just as now I see the election as a manifestation that the problem is NOT with Trump, but with our society.  Just like the televangelist charlatans who draw the sheep up to the front of the alter to be bled of their money and allegiance - how much is that a problem with the charlatans and how much is it a problem of the sheep?

So back in 2003, I made the proverbial “40 day wilderness experience” to try to come up with the “root cause analysis" of what was wrong with our society. Back then I came up with the observation that our society was lacking in the Skills of Democracy in four (at least0 areas.  These were the following:  1) critical analysis; 2) compassion and empathy; 3) outsourcing of ethics and justice; and 4) conflict management.  

Our lacking in critical analysis is largely based on the Age of Marketing where everything is expressed in terms of hyper-hyperbole.  Everything is exaggerated to the point where people don’t even try to “learn to discern” the difference between Truth and Non-Truth.  I could go on, but I’m sure you recognize the problem and don’t need me to elaborate.

I’m also sure that you recognize that our  society is lacking in compassion and empathy towards others, so I won’t elaborate here either.

The problem of “outsourcing of ethics and justice” should be explained.  As a society, we outsource our ethics by listening to and following those ethics of religion, religious leaders, gurus, and even politicians.  As a result, instead of setting up our own standards of ethics, we just accept what we are told by others or by various interpretations of holy books like the Bible, the Koran, or Eastern religions, etc.  We have shed ourselves of our own personal responsibility of ethics.  Instead of developing our own list of ethical standards, we “use” the lists outside of ourselves. 

The same is true with justice:  We outsource our principles of justice to our legal system which is so broken as to be pathetic. 

So in 2003 we didn’t feel personally violated in either our ethics of justice when we invaded Iraq.  So too, now, with Trump.  Trump, the demagogue of the 21st Century, is more than willing to be outsourced and be the voice of ethics and justice for our society looking for a source.  Instead of individuals developing their own principles of ethics and justice regarding Gaza, we just outsource the responsibility to “our US Democratic Government”. 

Back in 2003, I was so serious about these Democratic Skills that I decided to take a course in Conflict Management.  But I didn’t want to go to a Liberal, Left-Leaning University and be taught the same things I had learned throughout the Peace and Justice movement.  So I investigated and found an on-line course that was sponsored by the US State Department.  (With an Introduction by Henry Kissinger himself.)  This had been designed by the State Department for several countries in Central and South America.  (Evidently the  State Department determined that it would be better to teach them the principles of Conflict Management rather than have them follow our examples of how we responded in Cuba, and Nicaragua, and Chile, ad infinitum.  (smile)  The key takeaways here were “To Listen – Active Listening” and to “Dialogue”. 

I also took a series of courses and became “certified” in “Reconciliation Leadership” through the United Nations.  When I began that series, I didn’t even understand what “Reconciliation” entailed.  But I learned it was actually conflict management - dealing with areas of minor skirmishes such as the Philippines and Kosovo, etc.  And here I learned that the principles of conflict management were not only applicable in international conflicts, but also inter-personal conflicts, and even internal conflicts.  You hear people doing all kinds of training for internal stress, but I have never heard anyone taking any training for internal conflicts.  (Sigh)

Just as we were lacking in Conflict Management in 2003, so too we are lacking in it today.  That is why we are defined by our divisiveness.  That is why a demagogue such as Trump can master the art of creating conflict in order to control. 

Just as I found us lacking in these Democratic Skills in 2003, I’ve been putting up with that lack for these 20 years.  The main principle of American Democracy is that the majority wins.  If the majority is uneducated in critical analysis, compassion and empathy, insistent of outsourcing their ethics and justice principles, and lacking in conflict management, it is only natural that a demagogue such as Trump will be able to coalesce a majority.  It’s only natural that it will happen at some time.  And, lo and behold, that time is Now – just as Pogo’s statement is True:  “We have met the enemy, and the enemy is Us.” 

So this election did not surprise me.  As I mentioned, we have discovered that the problem is not just Trump, but with our uneducated society – uneducated in the Skills of Democracy. 

Note:  for both the Obama/McCain/Palin election and the Trump/Hillary election I performed a correlative analysis showing the States that went to which candidate as a correlation to that State’s ranking educationally - 1 through 50.  Of the top 15 States educationally, all but 2 or 3 went to the Progressive candidates; and of the bottom 15 States educationally, all but 2 or 3 went to the Conservative candidates – for both elections. 

After reading all kinds of analysis by the various politicos, I have yet to see one social critic suggest the long-term solution of trying to educate our society in my list of Democracy Skills.  (Sigh)

Enough. 

Now you know why I was not surprised by the election’s outcome.  I’ve had over 20 years of preparation for this time. 

As a solid example of the need for these skills even today – consider the situation in Gaza.  1)  Lack of critical analysis; 2) lack of compassion and empathy; 3) Lack of personal ethical principles and justice principles; and 4) lack of conflict management skills.  QED.

David

 

 

Saturday, November 2, 2024

 

Resiliency Cost

Time, effort, energy, money, and all the other resources that will be necessary to expend in order to bring a community back to its condition before a disaster.  Imagine what the Resiliency Cost will  be for this  community in Spain.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/31/world/gallery/flash-flooding-spain/index.html

Note especially the picture of the cars piled up blocking a tunnel.

One type of Resiliency Cost – Gainful employment.  How many people will be out of a job, with no income, because their place of employment is destroyed?  How many people will be unable to work and thus will have no income for an extended period of time while they try to rebound?

What will it take for each individual, with the myriad of individual nuances of problems, to rebount to where they are equal to what they were before the disaster?  What will it take for the community to rebound?  What is the area underneath the curve of the Resiliency Curve from the time of the disaster to the time of the rebound?

Empathy is not a feeling – it is an understanding.  Understand the problems of Resiliency and you will learn empathy.

 

Friday, November 1, 2024

 UN General Assembly condemns the US economic embargo of Cuba for a 32nd year

    


UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to condemn the American economic embargo of Cuba for a 32nd year after its foreign minister strongly criticized the Biden administration and expressed hope a new president would end it.

The vote in the 193-member world body was 187-2, with only the United States and Israel against the resolution, and one abstention. It tied the record for support for the Caribbean nation first reached in 2019 and again last year.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez blamed the U.S. government’s “maximum pressure policy” aimed at depriving Cuba of the imported fuel it relies on for a widespread blackout this month, including when Hurricane Oscar lashed the island.

“President Joseph Biden’s administration usually claims that its policy is intended to ‘help and support the Cuban people,’” he said. “Who would believe such an assertion?”

General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, but they reflect world opinion, and the vote has given Cuba an annual stage to demonstrate that the U.S. stands apart in its decades-old efforts to isolate the Caribbean nation.

Cuba has struggled with one of the worst economic and energy crises in its history. Besides waves of blackouts, citizens are frustrated over food shortages and inflation. Hundreds of thousands have migrated, many headed to the United States.

The embargo was imposed in 1960 following the revolution led by Fidel Castro and the nationalization of properties belonging to U.S. citizens and corporations. Two years later, it was strengthened.

In July 2016, then-Cuban President Raul Castro and then-President Barack Obama officially restored relations, and that year the U.S. abstained on the resolution calling for an end to the embargo for the first time. But Obama’s successor, Donald Trump, sharply criticized Cuba’s human rights record, and in 2017 the U.S. again voted against the resolution, and it has ever since.

U.S. deputy ambassador, Paul Folmsbee, told the assembly that the United States strongly supports the Cuban people’s pursuit of a future that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Sanctions are one element of our broader effort to advance democracy and promote respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Cuba,” he said.

He noted that about 1,000 political prisoners have been unjustly detained in Cuba, more than at any point in Cuba’s recent history.

Folmsbee said U.S. sanctions exempt food, medicine and other basic goods and that the U.S. exported nearly $336 million in agricultural products and authorized additional humanitarian exports last year.

In May, the U.S. lifted some financial restrictions against Cuba in an effort to boost private businesses on the island. That included allowing independent entrepreneurs to open and access U.S. bank accounts online to support their businesses as well as steps to open up more internet-based services and expand private companies’ ability to make certain financial transactions.

Rodriguez said that under Biden’s presidency, Cuba has lost more than $16 billion and that measures announced in the last year “as alleged palliatives” to the embargo are not effective.

Noting next week’s U.S. presidential election, the Cuban minister said the winner will have the opportunity to decide whether to continue “the inhumane siege measures of the last six decades” or heed an increasing number of Americans and an overwhelming majority of nations “and allow our country to develop its true potential and capabilities.”

Rodriguez said Cuba will defend its “right to build an independent, socialist future.”

But he also said Cuba is willing “to hold a serious and responsible dialogue and move on towards a constructive and civilized relationship” with the new U.S. administration.